Recent provisions promulgated by the Private Fund Investment Advisers Registration Act of 2010, a section of the Dodd-Frank legislation, requires managers to register with the SEC and implement a suitable compliance program if they either a.) have $100M of AUM (if managing a fund and separate accounts) or, b.) have $150M of AUM (if managing a fund only). Under SEC Rule 206(4)-7 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, those managers will need to design and manage a business continuity plan as part of the compliance program. Since the SEC has stated that an adviser has an obligation to protect its client’s assets from risks resulting from the adviser being unable to provide advisory services, an adviser must create and maintain a business continuity plan which is “reasonably designed” to enable the adviser to meet client obligations in the event of a natural disaster, emergency, or significant business disruption. In the accompanying Adopting Release Report to Rule 206(4)-7, the SEC specifically noted that, at a minimum, policies and procedures established must address, among a number of other issues, the investment adviser’s or the fund’s business continuity plan. (1) Globally, there are many business recovery standards developing to meet the needs of international organizations, such as the British Standard Institution’s BS 25999. It is important to assess which standard is appropriate for your organization, taking into consideration the nature of the business, international acceptance of BCP practices in your markets and management’s approach regarding risk management (not only regarding business continuity issues but also risk analysis and mitigation activities). Fortunately, best practice guidance is available to financial market participants from many credible sources. The SEC has co-authored the Interagency Paper on Sound Practices to Strengthen the Resilience of the U.S. Financial System, and the SMIFA and the MFA have published best practice guidelines for financial industry participants. Additionally, FINRA provides specific guidance for member firms under Rule 4370 (2). These include many areas of focus that are relevant to private fund advisers insofar as that they can provide a framework for best practices: A firm planning a top down approach to business continuity implementation focused on mitigating the affects of disruptions to the business achieved through a plan will need to focus on its strategic business priorities and review the relevance of guidelines within that context. Some specific items to work through in order to accomplish this are proposed by the SMIFA (3): (1) Mallon, Bart. Business Continuity Plans (Disaster Recovery Plans) | Investment Adviser Registration. Retrieved October 18, 2010, from http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com (2) Amended by SR-FINRA-2009-036 eff. Dec. 14, 2009. (3) SIMFA (2008) The Business Continuity Program – Expanded Practices Guidelines. New York. Business Continuity Planning Committee (4) Securities and Exchange Commission, Division of Investment Management website (www.sec.gov). SME, legal & industry interpretations appended.Executive Summary
Business Environment
Key Concerns/Issues
Key Questions
Terms
member’s business, to ensure prompt and accurate processing of securities transactions, including, but not limited to, order taking, order entry, execution, comparison, allocation, clearance and settlement of securities transactions, the maintenance of customer accounts, access to customer accounts and the delivery of funds and securities.
public register those securities and provide prospective investors with adequate disclosure in the form of an investment prospectus (5).Approach
Benefits
Citations
(5) “Protecting Investors: A Half Century of Investment Company Regulation”, United Sates Securities and Exchange Commission, Division of Investment Management, May 1992

